Luke 1:37 For with God nothing shall be impossible.

[RAMcGough]

Because I know codes that points to the Pythagorean prime order being relevant. Just look:

401 = PP(38)
CW of Vs(401) = 368 = perimeter of Octagram(8+8+8)

38 = code number for 888

How do you support the idea that 38 is a "code number" for 888?

I can't think of anything that reminds me of rot. so I will be using rot.
I can mix stuff up fast so I don't want to use mod. I hope you can understand.

And I have changed my signature now so that people know where to find the explenation of my abbreviations.

Sure, I understand. But FYI - rot. reminds me of rot (as in something rotting).

It's good that you put a link in your signature, but it's still too much work for most people to sort through. You have 54 methods of gematria! Plus dozens of numerical sequences like primes, composites, figurates, lucky, etc., etc. etc.

It looks like total chaos to me. How do you find any real patterns if you allow yourself to draw random lines between random numbers?

Many blessings,

Richard

[Alex]

It looks like total chaos to me. How do you find any real patterns if you allow yourself to draw random lines between random numbers?

well, I have decoded many many verses and done a whole lot more verse integrations than you.

So I know by experience.

[Alex]

How many methods do you think it should be? And why?

[Alex]

And if there are methods you would like to explore then we can do that also.

[RAMcGough]

It looks like total chaos to me. How do you find any real patterns if you allow yourself to draw random lines between random numbers?

well, I have decoded many many verses and done a whole lot more verse integrations than you.

So I know by experience.

If you know, why can't you say?

If you have 54 different methods of gematria and dozens of integer sequences to choose from then you could find dozens of connections in any random set of data. This is a mathematical fact. How do you answer this fact ?

[Alex]

Let me ask you a question now, since I have answered yours. I told you how I knew those 54 methods are valid.

It's my turn to ask a question here.

Does these codes look like design or not?
If not then why?

Verse# 137 (Medium).png (693.83 KiB) Viewed 7759 times

Verse# 137 P.2 (Medium).png (743.82 KiB) Viewed 7759 times

[RAMcGough]

Let me ask you a question now, since I have answered yours. I told you how I knew those 54 methods are valid.

It's my turn to ask a question here.

Does these codes look like design or not?
If not then why?

Verse# 137 (Medium).png

Verse# 137 P.2 (Medium).png

Hey there Alex,

You didn't really didn't answer my question. You didn't tell me how you know. You merely claimed you "know" because you have lots of "experience".

As for those "codes" - to me, they look like a hurricane hit a random number factory. I see no sign of any design except the bits and pieces you've copied from serious researchers. I've explained my reasons why. Let me explain again. When you use 54 methods and dozens of number sequences, you can connect any random number to any other random number. Are you disputing this point?

Here's an example that proves my point. You use the word "and" in many of your patterns on your 777 page here: https://777codes.com/index.php/number-777/

Rather than spending hours trying to sort through all the random numbers, I asked Grok to find all the different values you associated with just that one little tiny word "and". It found this list of 23 different values for just that one word! Now do that with every other random word and number in your endless lists, and you should be able to understand what I mean when I say that your "codes" are indistinguishable from totally random numbers.

image.png (42.36 KiB) Viewed 9143 times

Please take no offense, as none is intended. You asked, I answered. Do you understand my explanation?

God bless you my friend,

Richard

[Alex]

No offence taken.
But do you consider this also a mess then?

Triangle 112 (M).png (918.17 KiB) Viewed 7732 times

Creation codes 1 (Medium).png (700.72 KiB) Viewed 7758 times

Creation codes 2 (Medium).png (701.14 KiB) Viewed 7758 times

[RAMcGough]

No offence taken.

That is very good to hear. I never want our intellectual disagreements to ruin our friendship or fellowship in the Lord.

But do you consider this also a mess then?

Yes, of course, the numbers and connections are a total mess, but they are arranged in a very elegant and artful fashion!

What is it about my explanation that you don't understand? Every single word and number can be associated with many other words and numbers. Like the 23 numbers you associated with the one tiny little word "and". With than much freedom, you can "connect" anything to anything and so there is no meaning in any of it.

Why don't you understand this? I'm not the only one who has explained it to you. I know Leo tried.

God bless!

Richard

[Alex]

You guys fail to see that you pick connections to words according to the context of how you find them.
I have explained this in detail to Leo in the e-mails.

And I have explained to you before that there are different categories in these codes ranging from 666 to 999.
Phyiscs, prophecy. the 12 Tribes of Israel...

So you have to accept that I know way more about the 777 codes than you and Leo.
Will you accept this?