Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

[girardlys]

This is not personal, in-fact it's healthy. If Richard did not tell me how it really was when I was here back in 2017 and noobish myself then I would never have learned from it. So I suggest you just try to learn from the conversations here and see how these codes work because you have just seen a bit. This forum has just been reopened.

i'm here to learn about/from everyone, it's ok.

[Alex]

That is good to hear.
Just look at how noob I was once, so I understand the gematria of noobs:

I just laugh when I look at that image. But hey, gematria is a game you level up in.

[Alex]

And look at how wild I was.
This was me when I discovered Illustrator and had my first shot at an industry-grade designer program:

[Megiddo]

Hi Alex, 

What's wrong with mentioning or highlighting something from the Talmud? You act like I was saying the Talmud is divinely inspired or something. There's nothing wrong with quoting from ANY book in a historical context. 

May I ask why you always use 1 as the first prime in your "codes" but then turn around and always have 2 as the first prime whenever you use semiprimes? Do you not see the inconsistency there or are you just trolling everyone? 

Why would God use mathematical codes to be discovered in our day with 1 as the first prime when professional mathematicians universally say 2 is the first prime? Doesn't God know how primes would be defined during the generation when Biblical codes would be uncovered? I'm pretty sure he does.

I can show how the prime codes in Biblical Numerics are based on 2 being the first prime with straightforward logic. For example, here's a powerful find I made years ago (note that prime/composite numbers are naturally related): 

"Jesus" (SH) = 391 
"Jesus" (SG) = 888 

The composite index of 888 = 733 
The 888th composite number = 1068 

733 + 888 + 1068 = P(391) 

Do you see that? The COMPOSITE IDENTITY of the Standard Greek value of Jesus is literally a PRIME POINTER to the Standard Hebrew value of Jesus. 

It gets even better when we look at geometry (something Bill rightfully said is lacking in your work). The natural Hexagon that pairs with T73 is Hexagon 1801. Do you realize what that means? 

Observe: 733 + 1068 = 1801 

Yes, the natural Hexagon within T73 (i.e. the G 1:1 Triangle) is itself the sum of the composite index of 888 and the 888th composite number, which then points to the 391st prime when we add them to 888! 

For the record, the phenomenon of geometric pairing is foundational to Biblical Numerics and was pioneered by the late Vernon Jenkins. The fact that you want to downgrade its significance or importance only exposes you as an incompetent researcher. You also expose yourself when you make stupid claims like 777 being more foundational than 37. How can 37 be a "code" for 777 when 777 is not even a prime and 37 is a prime factor of 777? Obviously it's the other way around: 777 points to 37 (i.e. three sevens), which is THE foundational prime of Biblical Numerics.

Now get out your calculator and add up with me the 24 EVEN rows within the Genesis 1:1 Hexagon of 1801: 

1) 26
2) 28
3) 30
4) 32
5) 34
6) 36
7) 38
8) 40
9) 42
10) 44
11) 46
12) 48
13) 48
14) 46
15) 44
16) 42
17) 40
18) 38
19) 36
20) 34
21) 32
22) 30
23) 28
24) 26

Sum of EVEN rows in G 1:1 Hexagon = 888 

The EXACT average of those rows = 37 

I'll let you figure out what the sum of the ODD rows are. Let's just say they take us all the way back to the beginning (as in the very first Hebrew word of the Bible) 


Summary: 

1) The composite indentity of 888 = The prime index of 391 
2) This composite identity actually forms the G 1:1 Hexagon 
3) The even rows of this Hexagon itself = 888 = An exact average of 37 counters per row 

Can you present any evidence with straightforward logic (like I did here) to justify the use of 1 as the first prime? I suspect you'll just keep giving us the same incomprehensible mess that nobody can read without getting a massive headache. 

Straightforward logic, not your endless manipulations of words/numbers and endless steps to get to something you like.


Leo Tavares (aka Megiddo)

[Alex]

I said that it irritated me when you mentioned the Talmud. Also known as THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD.
And I did not want you to come here for me to answer your questions. I wanted you to team up with Richard and Downie on the question regarding:
1 being the first prime and the extended digit method being valid. Are you up for it?
Three against one should be fair as I am a Benjamite.

[Megiddo]

I said that it irritated me when you mentioned the Talmud. Also known as THE BABYLONIAN TALMUD.
And I did not want you to come here for me to answer your questions. I wanted you to team up with Richard and Downie on the question regarding:
1 being the first prime and the extended digit method being valid. Are you up for it?
Three against one should be fair as I am a Benjamite.

Sir, you're not a Benjamite, you're a BOZO.

I already proved to you that Scandinavians cannot be descended from the ancient Israelites because the main paternal Y-DNA marker of Scandinavians is I1, which is not found in ANY ancient Levantine cadavers: https://haplotree.info/maps/ancient_dna ... cdesc=DESC

The predominant Y-DNA markers of Biblical Levantines (J and E1B1B) matches PRECISELY the predominant Y-DNA markers of modern Jewish people and modern Palestinians.

Notice how this also debunks your mindless number games because I've seen you try to use that to support your factually incorrect claims about Europeans being descended from the ancient Israelites.


Leo Tavares (aka Megiddo)

[Alex]

We can debate that some other time Leo. yes or no. Will you team up with them?

[Megiddo]

We can debate that some other time Leo. yes or no. Will you team up with them?

Why would Richard or Bill need me to debunk your stupid number games? Your arrogance (and delusion) is really off the charts!

Can you present any evidence with straightforward logic (like I did here) to justify the use of 1 as the first prime or are you just going to keep giving us the same incomprehensible mess that nobody can read without getting a massive headache?

Straightforward logic, not your endless manipulations of words/numbers and endless steps to get to something you like.


Leo Tavares (aka Megiddo)

[Alex]

Alright, let's talk about that. I will make a new thread about number 1 being the first prime here and then you guys can come and debate it.
Fair and square.

Now I need some time to prepare as I will be going against three guys so I will make that thread on the date of 3/7/2026.

[RAMcGough]

Alright, let's talk about that. I will make a new thread about number 1 being the first prime here and then you guys can come and debate it.
Fair and square.

Now I need some time to prepare as I will be going against three guys so I will make that thread on the date of 3/7/2026.

Awesome! I look forward to it. But don't worry about getting everything perfect before starting. The whole point of the discussion is for us to help each other discern the truth. No need to think of it as a competition or battle.