Alex wrote: Wed Feb 11, 2026 5:23 pm
I can just about accept that 37 is 'code' for 777, but you cannot add 100 to 316 then say that 416 is encoded. If everything is encoded, nothing is encoded and you could do that with just about any number.
Oh so then what about this:
TV of verses ordered at 913, 203, 86, 401, 395, 407 & 296 = 22408 = (1+7)x(100+37x73)
CW of r+o+s Gen 1:1 = 429 = Pri-o(2969 = CW of verses ordered at 913, 203, 86, 401, 395, 407 & 296 = 1600 + Squ(37))
There's no code there. You just did the same again. It would have been nice if it had been 8 x 2701, but it isn't. It's 8 x 2801. It can be very tempting to do things like that and claim it's encoded, but I call that "cranking It in". Another researcher did the same in his book. He found that 52 x 52 = 2704, which is close to 2701, and then tried to claim it was encoded with the name YHVH, since 52 is 2 x 26. No.
There are more than enough genuine codes in there to keep all of us going for lifetimes. It is vast, holographic, like a computer zip file awaiting extraction. I can't believe myself what I've recently found encoded within Genesis 1.1, and which will be in a forthcoming book. I didn't even need to go beyond standard values and I left out far more than I put in. It's all beautifully integrated to proclaim the same message. And that is just one verse!
I'm not speaking from some lofty plane of understanding here. I'm speaking from experience of my own mistakes, which now embarrass me. None of us can do this perfectly, because our thinking is linear but the code is fractal; our decisions are colored by our own biases and personal history, but the code is supremely logical; we operate in time, but the code was created from a realm beyond time. That's how they were put in - fractal codes are the surest sign of Divine encoding. That's also why they are so geometric and why fractal geometry naturally emerges. Genesis 1.1 is full of fractal snowflakes, anti snowflakes, Sierpinski triangles and more, in conscious reflection of their fractal nature.
Alex wrote: Wed Feb 11, 2026 5:23 pm
FLW of English verses ordered at 913, 203, 86, 401, 395, 407 & 296 = 4001
= Pri(552 = remaining counters of Downie's Star after the Logos Star is removed from the center)
CW of Gen 1:1 = 401
I don't know what FLW means, but you equate 4001 with 401. That's a superficial resemblance which likely shouldn't be included, because there are many of them to be found and at best they are ornamentation on the codes. For example, I found two Koch anti snowflakes in a mirrored pattern in Genesis 1.1. One came from triangle 496, the other from triangle 946. These are numerical anagrams. I suspect it was deliberate, but I didn't mention it. The reader notices these things and they add to the sense it was encoded without you having to state it.
Making a connection with star 925 because 4001 is the 552nd prime is a stretch too. I find these pseudo-patterns, or 'resonances', all the time and I've trained myself to ignore them. At best they obscure more important connections. At worst they are coincidences, or an inevitable consequence of the radix - and it's often difficult to tell which. The code is like a path through a forest of numbers, but these are false trails, rabbit tracks, which lead nowhere.
Thank you. I like it myself and it's nice to see Jesus Christ represented as a Star.
The centered triangles and their derivative figures are sadly neglected. If I had the time I'd like to do a complete study of them, because I've found an awful lot there, mostly unpublished. When I first started I could find nothing online about them and soon realized I was in virgin territory. It's exciting breaking new ground and if you, Alex, wanted to, you could make further discoveries yourself there. I've hardly begun mapping it out. There are centred triangles, their hexagons and hexagrams, their trefoils, triangular trefoils, fractal snowflakes of various iterations, and Sierpinski triangles. I've already found some and for examples there are two Sierpinski triangles derived from centred triangles encoded as another mirrored pair in Genesis 1.1.
A few years ago, John Elias created numerical sequences from fractal snowflakes I found in the past, and got them published on the OEIS. There are dozens, maybe hundreds, of new sequences that could be found from the fractals I've mentioned. No one has done anything on them and it's not my field of interest. I can send you, or anyone else who might be interested, some information on them. You have to create the generating formula too. I find that difficult, but I've found a few, mostly by trial and error, for some fractal snowflakes and trefoils.
There are fascinating connections with other areas of mathematics too. For example, Starting with hexagram 1, an alternating snowflake/antisnowflake sequence can be created, found by what I call the 6+1 day Creation function. Each iteration is created from the previous iteration by sounding the previous iteration with a hexagonal ring of six copies of the central, seventh-day figure. For example, surrounding hexagram 37 with six copies of hexagon 19 gives anti snowflake 151. Surrounding this with six copies of hexagram 37 gives star 373, etc.
The simplest sequence goes:
1, 7, 13, 55, 133, 463, 1261, 4039 . . . .
I checked it on the OEIS and it is the sequence of generalized Fibonacci numbers (AO14551)! I didn't expect that! It could be telling us something important or a deep connection at least.