Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pm
Two first words = 351 = Tri(26)
3 CW = 316 = C.Tri(15 = Tri(5 = PP-o(37))) = C.Hepta(3+7)
Two last words = 325 = Tri(25)
We don't even have to know the meaning of these numbers/Triangles here to see that this is design.
This is interesting Alex, and I agree it looks like design. There may be more hidden in there.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pmBut Genesis 1:1 does not give us such a strong case of design regarding this division of 2 FW, 2 LW & 3 CW.
You couldn't be more wrong. The 2-3-2 division is fundamental, as Explained in my previous post.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pm
2 FW = 1116 "seven seven seven" שבע שבע שבע
3 CW = 882 = Comp(729 (α))
2 LW = 703 = Tri(37)
The first one is very interesting! As I indicated in my last post, 1116 is also three conjoined fractal snowflakes of 373 counters - the Logos x 3! The fact that this also means three sevens in Hebrew only adds to it, particularly because each element of the triangle has 372 counters.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pmAnd this makes sense because Alpha is in the
center here.
I disagree. This is too remote an association to be valid, in my opinion. The 729th composite number? 729 is alpha? Come on. The error is 1 in 990, which isn't too great, and a scaling factor has to be used too. Also, the value of the three central words, 882, is part of the internal structure of triangle 2701, and links to 'six-hundred-and-sixty-six' and Kurios Ihsous Christos numbered as the beast. That is its primary association. It fits beautifully that way.
All of this encoded geometry is framing and highlighting Star 937 (and trefoil 505). 937 sits at the centre of triangle 2701 and means theriou/beast. 937 as a Star of David gives 469 (hexagon) and 468 (crown).
In English, we have
The Lord God (s) = 468
Heaven (s) = 469
Jesus Christ as God is the Star of David 937/469, which superficially resembles hexagram 937 (the beast).
The 'beast' is life surviving in this realm of duality, the horned beasts that the high priest sacrificed on Yom Kippur. That was Jesus, because the crucifixion was the fulfillment of Yom Kippur. Jesus was also the high priest, and the atonement cover of the Ark, and the Ark and the staff, tablets, manna and law. It's all one great METAPHOR!
Forget Hollywood. Forget fundamentalist Christianity. This is the TRUTH that Genesis 1.1 is revealing. It's geometric, it's obvious and it's integrated. All three spellings used in Revelation for the beast- 937, 597, 247 are accommodated within triangle 2701. 505 is also h'tannyim/the great dragon, used in Ezekiel 29.3. 'Trefoil' mean 'three-leaved', and 505 as a trefoil also represents the beast, life surviving in this world - and all life contains a Divine spark.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pm37 = code number for 777
CW of Vs(37) = 416 = 100 + CW of Vs(777)
I can just about accept that 37 is 'code' for 777, but you cannot add 100 to 316 then say that 416 is encoded. If everything is encoded, nothing is encoded and you could do that with just about any number.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pm
So that was the main layer of those codes.
No it is not.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pmBut 666 might be in an alternative layer here as you have found out that
882 = 3x 294 "six hundred and sixty six" (E o).
However, I would argue that this might be because 882 = Comp(729 = 9x9x9). 999 = 666 with upsidedown digits.
999 is 999, not 666 upside-down. 729 isn't 999 anyway. It's 9 cubed and even that is based on the fact that 882 is the 729th composite number. This is where discernment comes in. I think 216 is a stand-in for 666, but you have taken it four steps:
1. 882 is the 729th composite number.
2. 729 is 9 x 9 x 9
3. This stands for 999
4. 999 upside down is 666.
The connection gets thinner every time, before it disappears into nonexistence. Can't you see that this is completely unjustified? You are very smart with numbers, Alex, and could contribute a lot to the numerical exegesis of Scripture, but not by doing this kind of stuff. The code itself teaches you. When you do this kind of stuff you are wasting your talents. Another error is people who use these codes to try to justify what they already believe to be true, which always turns out to be a narrow, fundamentalist form of Christianity that also refuses to accept English gematria or alternative systems, despite the voluminous evidence for them. They will never accept that Jesus is the beast, even though the evidence for that is utterly compelling now.
So I'm not singling you out. I made plenty of mistakes myself in the past and still do make errors. My entire website badly needs an edit to take out stuff I can now see is unjustified (but I can't be bothered as it would be a huge amount of work and my computer doesn't work properly). But that is how we proceed, with trepidation, knowing we've probably gotten some things wrong and trying to avoid the most obvious errors.
Even Vernon Jenkins went off on unnecessary tangents. No one reveres his work more than I do, but he missed an awful lot in Genesis 1.1 and distorted it somewhat, because he tried to include the first word of Genesis 1.2. It does deserve to be included, but mainly because of its tetrahedral extension (which he was the first to observe). As a triangle, 3003 does not fully coordinate with 2701.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pmBut your way fits also here because:
1116+703 = 1819 --- 18+19 = 37 = prime factor of 666
There is an echo there of Star of David 37/19, yes, although I usually let these kinds of connections go, since, the reader is easily swamped by all the numbers. It's not about 666 though. Its about star 37. Let the geometry lead the way! And I don't mean the geometry of heptograms and nonagrams. I mean the geometry of G-triangles and triangles in general.
Alex wrote: Tue Feb 10, 2026 12:15 pmAnd I don't like your Trefoil pick there as you have different types of Trefoils you can choose from.
I don't like how you get 505 there as we know the CW + mirror is also = 505.
And that you connected it to a Trefoil instead of a Heptagram or Nonagram is weird to me because a Trefoil will always belong in the cathegory of alternative polygons while Heptagrams and Nonagrams are in the standard polygrams cathegory.
Sure no one uses Heptagrams except me but what other people do does not matter, logic matters.
Why not rather just do: W. up to CW - W. from CW = 104 "Aleph and Tav" (E o) = mirror of את
Because, for the last time, the geometry leads the way! I didn't connected anything to anything. I just discovered that 505 is a conjoined rhombic trefoil, which can be cut from triangle 703 and which is the first iteration of the Koch anti snowflake process. I didn't put it in Genesis 1.1 either. Whoever encoded Genesis 1.1 did and from what I've written today, you can hopefully gather that trefoils, especially triangular trefoils, are as dear to the Encoder as triangles. Stop classifying things. The trefoil is there by subtraction of the last three words from the first four. That also suggests 43, reduced value of Jesus Christ in English and Hebrew, and, you guessed it, a triangular trefoil! Conjoined trefoils are one of three types, which I call conjoined, touching and branched, and which can be cut from G-triangles and centred triangles (conjoined), G+1 triangles (touching) and G+2 triangles (branched).