SonOfZion232 wrote: Wed Mar 11, 2026 4:17 pm
Shalom Richard
Until now, I was not aware that the first τε was disputed, and it doesn't matter because the result shows that the Almighty knew that it would be included. The text of the BibleWheel database has it in it also. So to make your discovery work, it must be removed is what you are telling me. Many times it is not this way or that way, It's both ways, God is smarter than you know, The result speaks for Itself and does not Lie. Habakkuk 2:2-3 For those given to receive It.
Wind = 50 - Fifty = 66 = 12 = 3
πνοης = 408 = 12 = 3
Four Hundred Eight = 183 = 12 = 3
317) Verse 26952 = 24 = 2*12 | Acts 2:2 = 4 _ (28) 10=1
And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing Mighty Wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.
317) 66th Prime 12 = 3 _ (383) 14=5 - 76th Prime 13=4 (459) 18=9
Acts Two - Two = 159
Verse Value = 1140
159 + 1140 = 1299 = 21 = 3
317th Prime = 2099
Peace
LJ
Peace to you LJ.
It is interesting that you cite Habakkuk 2:2 since I put that verse on the title page of my book. Thing is, your claims are anything but "plain" to me. Take for example you claim that "wind = 50". You didn't say which method of gematria you used. So I took a guess and found it is the
ordinal English value. And then you took the English word "fifty" and used it's ordinal value 66 and then took the digit root of that. Then you took the
Greek standard value of the
genitive form of one of the three Greek words for "wind" (the other two being amemos and pneuma) and noted that it also has a digital root of 3.
You could have chosen many other words and spellings for "wind". Here are the options you had available according to your method:
### 1. ἄνεμος (anemos) – "wind" (masculine, second declension)
**Singular**
- Nominative: ἄνεμος
- Genitive: ἀνέμου
- Dative: ἀνέμῳ
- Accusative: ἄνεμον
- Vocative: ἄνεμε
**Plural**
- Nominative: ἄνεμοι
- Genitive: ἀνέμων
- Dative: ἀνέμοις
- Accusative: ἀνέμους
- Vocative: ἄνεμοι
### 2. πνεῦμα (pneuma) – "wind" (or "spirit/breath"; neuter, third declension)
**Singular**
- Nominative: πνεῦμα
- Genitive: πνεύματος
- Dative: πνεύματι
- Accusative: πνεῦμα
- Vocative: πνεῦμα
**Plural**
- Nominative: πνεύματα
- Genitive: πνευμάτων
- Dative: πνεύμασι(ν)
- Accusative: πνεύματα
- Vocative: πνεύματα
### 3. πνοή (pnoē) – "wind/breeze/breath" (feminine, first declension)
**Singular** (only singular attested in NT)
- Nominative: πνοή
-
Genitive: πνοῆς <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< the one you chose.
- Dative: πνοῇ
- Accusative: πνοήν
- Vocative: πνοή
**Plural** (theoretical; not attested in NT for this word)
- Nominative: πνοαί
- Genitive: πνοῶν
- Dative: πνοαῖς
- Accusative: πνοάς
- Vocative: πνοαί
These are the bare word forms in each case. In actual New Testament usage,
the most frequent cases for literal wind are nominative/accusative singular and plural of ἄνεμος, with πνεῦμα and πνοή appearing in more limited contexts and cases.
That's a total 30 words with 30 different numerical values you could have used to make your "connections." You chose one of those 30, and it wasn't the most common one. Why did you choose that one instead of any of the other 29 possibilities?
Bottom line: I'd be very surprised if one in thousand people using your methods would ever came to the same conclusion on any point. Can you explain how can it be a "code" if no two people could ever come to the same conclusion?
I agree God is smarter than you or I could ever imagine. And that's why it's hard for me to imagine that he would use such a random, arbitrary, unverifiable method to "code" anything. Please try to understand what I'm saying. Suppose God really did encode things the way you say He did. How could we tell?
I can't see any way to discern between your patterns are random chance. If you have any ideas how to do that, please explain!
I pray God bless you with abundant peace my brother,
Richard