Page 18 of 24

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 9:12 am
by Alex
TV = 21784 = perimeter of Hepta(3113 = COG in Tri(37) w. ext...)
FLW = 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)
CW = 2691 = (181 = midpoint of the center row in Tri(37))-gonal(6)
FLCW = 7471 = Lucky(868 = (43 = Heptagram(3))-gonal(7) = Three Triangles & Seven Heptagons ordered at 7)
That is called geometry.

And the fact that the FLW connects to the perimeter of Tri(37) while the CW connects to the midpoint of the center row in Tri(37) is pretty incredible.
FLW of Vs(216 = perimeter of Tri(73)) = Tri(37)
CW of Eng ord Vs(108 = perimeter of Tri(37)) = 37

The TV connects to both Triangle & Heptagon,
Triangles has 3 sides & Heptagons has 7 sides.

TV of Gen 1:1 = 2701 = mirror of 1072 "universe" (E o+s)
CW of Gen 1:1 = 401 = mirror of "and the earth" (E o)
We see the concept again here as 2701 is the outer layer while CW is the center.

It's all very clear here but I guess it's not good enough for you. Too bad.

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 9:44 am
by Alex
316 = CW of Vs(777)
TV/FLW/CW/FLCW of Vs(777) is 2314/197/316/513 = 0.00007245905 ≈ 0.00007246
1, 316 & 7246 are the only numbers below 3.8 million that is both a Centered Triangle & Centered Heptagon.
Triangles has 3 sides & Heptagons has 7 sides.

"next level geometry of gematria" (E r+o+s) = 3306 = r+o+s Vs(3432 = Tri(7) + Tri(37) + Tri(73)) = Hepta(7) + Hepta(7) + Hepta(7) w. 0 rem.
"next level geometry of gematria" (E rr+ro+rs) = 5000 + Tri(37) = rr+ro+rs Vs(1451 = Pri(231 = Tri(7+7+7))) = Eng o+s Vs(13777)

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 9:53 am
by Alex
TV of Vs(24237 = Tri(3) + Hepta(16) + Tri(72) + Hepta(46) + C.Tri(3) + C.Hepta(16) + C.Tri(72) + C.Hepta(46)) = 8256
= Tri(128 "thirty and seven" שלושים ושבע (o)) = Happy(1208 = Comp(307+703))

W. up to order 316 by rot. of Vs(24237) = 2314 = TriHeptagram(18) = C.TriHeptagram(17) = TV of Vs(777)

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 10:08 am
by Alex
3160 = 10x 316 = Lucky-o(32173 = 7246 digits added φ) = Tri(79 = Pri(23) = Happy(14))

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 10:26 am
by Alex
inverse α is 1/137.035999206

3599 = middle digits of inverse α = Pri-o(33599 = 316 digits added of φ + 7246 digits added of φ)
= 7 CW of Vs(37) + 7 CW of Vs(73)
= W. from CW in Vs(12777 = 127 (high energy inverse α) merged with 777)

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 12:00 pm
by bluetriangle
Alex wrote: Mon Feb 23, 2026 9:12 am
TV = 21784 = perimeter of Hepta(3113 = COG in Tri(37) w. ext...)
FLW = 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)
CW = 2691 = (181 = midpoint of the center row in Tri(37))-gonal(6)
FLCW = 7471 = Lucky(868 = (43 = Heptagram(3))-gonal(7) = Three Triangles & Seven Heptagons ordered at 7)
That is called geometry.

And the fact that the FLW connects to the perimeter of Tri(37) while the CW connects to the midpoint of the center row in Tri(37) is pretty incredible.
The FLW is 4780. How does this become 108?

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 12:04 pm
by Alex
Oh man.... You have to learn some stuff don't you?

108-gonal(10) is a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
Go read the tutorial like everyone else: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 12:06 pm
by Alex
Just because you refuse to install Windows and use the Number Properties Tool does not give you the benefit to require answers from me all the time.
Get Linux or something.

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 10:26 pm
by RAMcGough
bluetriangle wrote: Wed Jan 28, 2026 2:47 pm Just a quick note to draw attention to a new discovery I just made. The image shows all the triangles and centred triangles from letter counts in Genesis 1.1. Each triangle is centred over the word string with that number of letters. For example, words 2, 3 and 4 have ten letters between them, so triangle 10 is centred over word 3.

As you can see, there are 11 triangles and they form a symmetrical pattern of mirrored triangles in the verse, something the winds of chance could not have achieved without a little help from the wind of Spirit. So the mirror of triangle 10 is another triangle of ten counters, over words 6, 5 and 4.

There are three mirrored pairs beginning at words 2 and 6:
triangle 3 (words 2 and 6
triangle 10 (words 2, 3, 4 and words 6, 5, 4).
triangle 15 (words 2, 3, 4, 5 and words 6, 5, 4, 3)

So 2 and 6, suggesting 26 (YHVH) are highlighted.

The total number of counters in all the triangles is 134, which is an alternative spelling of Theos (God) in Greek.

G1.1 Triangles.png
Hi Bill,

I got curious about the triangles you found in Genesis 1.1. My intuition was that the numbers are based on letter counts, which tend to be very small and clustered around the number 4, and so triangles are probably very common. In G1.1 the numbers are 6,3,5,2,5,3,4 so the average is exactly 28/7 = 4 letters per word.

So I wrote a little program to find a thousand verses with seven words (to compare with G1.1) and looked for the ones with the highest number of triangles derived from running sums of letter counts. The winner was 1Ch 2:45 And the son of Shammai was Maon: and Maon was the father of Bethzur. with letter count sequence 3,3,3,5,4,3,3. This yields 14 triangular numbers. Second up is Exodus 25:13 "And thou shalt make staves of shittim wood, and overlay them with gold." with 12 triangles because of its very repetitive letter count 3,3,5,4,3,3,5 which includes 4 words with 3 letters. Third is Psa 50:20 "Thou sittest and speakest against thy brother; thou slanderest thine own mother's son." with 13. Another is Gen 36:8 "Thus dwelt Esau in mount Seir: Esau is Edom." It letter count sequence is 4,3,3,4,3,3,4 and it yields 11 triangles. It is interesting that Gen 7:24 "And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days." letter count 3,4,5,4,2,4,6 has only two triangles but yields 10 running triangular numbers.

Here are the stats I calculated for verses with seven words:

Mean number of triangular sums: 6.13
Standard Deviation 2.28
Median 6

Conclusion: The 9 triangular numbers derived from the running sums of the letter count sequence of Genesis 1:1 is well above average (in the 82nd percentile) but not enough to make me think it is a sign of divine design. The typical letter count between 3-5 makes any "encoding" extremely difficult to differentiate from random noise in this case.

But hey! I could be wrong. I'm open to any correction.

God bless you in your study of God's amazing Word!

Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

Posted: Mon Feb 23, 2026 10:46 pm
by bluetriangle
Alex wrote: Mon Feb 23, 2026 12:04 pm Oh man.... You have to learn some stuff don't you?

108-gonal(10) is a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
Go read the tutorial like everyone else: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/
No, you're not getting away with that. First you create your own obtuse nomenclature, then you don't use it properly. This is what you wrote.

FLW = 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)

FLW = first and last words. Then you have 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)). This makes no sense. You said above that 108-gonal-10 is a polygon with 108 sides, order 10. Yes, I get that. But in your post it becomes

FLW = 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)

What am I supposed to get from (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10), which is actually the perimeter of a 108-gon, as you just said above? Where is the clarity?

Are you trying to make things difficult? I'm willing to work with you and explore whether or not you have a code here, but you are so obtuse in your language (and I appreciate that English isn't your first language) that it's difficult to discern what's going on.

Alex, you have to be as clear as possible all the time. You are not. You fill your posts with numbers that I doubt anyone could even attempt to decipher without going insane. In fact I seriously doubt if anyone has ever done that. You are writing for yourself. The information density is incredible, the terminology is obtuse and there is no real overarching connection. All you are doing is listing numerical properties, and you aren't even doing that very well.

Connecting that fact that the FLW of whatever verse it was is the same as T37 is such a tenuous connection that it isn't worth doing anyway. I'm not trying to be nasty here. I'm trying to wake you up.