Leo:
"2368 created the universe"
1John 5:21
Τεκνία, φυλάξατε ἑαυτὰ ἀπὸ τῶν εἰδώλων
https://www.greekbible.com/1-john/5
https://biblehub.com/1_john/5-21.htm
The Willy Nilly Chronicles
Re: The Willy Nilly Chronicles
You just said I proved that digital summation can be used with the Standard/Ordinal union of Genesis 1:1 + John 1:1 and now you're contradicting yourself one hour later. Your mind is pure chaos.
Alex, I don't have to check 1000 different sets. You need to explain why the very first THREE sets yield the following self-referencing convergence:
1) The Ordinal Greek value of LOGOS at the 22nd term
2) The Standard Greek value of LOGOS at the next 22nd term
3) T22 + T42 + T112 at the next 22nd term
You didn't forget that the concatenation of these three exact values (1124222) is also a product of the LOGOS (373), did you?
You have no valid reason to apply cycles of 1 through 9 to any alphabet. You definitely can't validate it with either the Hebrew or the English alphabet, since both of them would yield the same results as my digital sum method. Therefore, you would have to show it with the Biblical Greek AND it would have to be better than the self-referencing semantic/geometric structure I showed for the digital sum union of Genesis 1:1/John 1:1 (since you apparently don't accept my evidence for it).
Can you do that? Otherwise, what's the point of using the "reduced method" at all?
2368 is God,
Leo
Alex, I don't have to check 1000 different sets. You need to explain why the very first THREE sets yield the following self-referencing convergence:
1) The Ordinal Greek value of LOGOS at the 22nd term
2) The Standard Greek value of LOGOS at the next 22nd term
3) T22 + T42 + T112 at the next 22nd term
You didn't forget that the concatenation of these three exact values (1124222) is also a product of the LOGOS (373), did you?
You have no valid reason to apply cycles of 1 through 9 to any alphabet. You definitely can't validate it with either the Hebrew or the English alphabet, since both of them would yield the same results as my digital sum method. Therefore, you would have to show it with the Biblical Greek AND it would have to be better than the self-referencing semantic/geometric structure I showed for the digital sum union of Genesis 1:1/John 1:1 (since you apparently don't accept my evidence for it).
Can you do that? Otherwise, what's the point of using the "reduced method" at all?
2368 is God,
Leo