jesus and narcasistic numbers gematria code cracked

[magicsquareman123]

hi all, i am just having some fun with gematria and found something pretty cool well, i thought so lol

IF..... A = 1, B = 2, C = 3, ALL THE WAY TO, Z=26.
THEN,

JESUS = 74
CROSS = 74
THREE = 56
NAILS = 55
THORN = 75
CROWN = 73

ADDING THESE VALUES WE GET 407 WHICH IS A NARCISSISTIC NUMBER, 11 X 37 = 407

THREE NAILS ................................= 3 X 37
JESUS CROSS ...............................= 4 X 37
CROSS THREE NAILS ......................= 5 X 37
JESUS THORN CROWN ....................= 6 X 37
JESUS CROSS THREE NAILS .............= 7 X 37
JESUS CROSS THORN CROWN.......... = 8 X 37
JESUS THORN CROWN THREE NAILS = 9 X 37

THE NEXT LEVEL OF THIS IS TO COMPRESS THE VALUES COMPRESSION IS ALSO KNOWN AS DIGITAL ROUTE

WE GET

JESUS = 11
CROSS = 20
THREE = 29
NAILS = 19
THORN = 30
CROWN = 28

ADDING THE COMPRESSED VALUES WE GET 137.
137 IN THE PHYSICS WORLD IS KNOWN AS THE FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT ITS SYMBOL IS ALPHA AND IT IS SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE entire UNIVERSE, WITHOUT THIS NUMBER WE WOULD NOT BE HERE.

THE NEXT LEVEL IS TOTAL COMPRESSION OF NAMES/WORDS

JESUS = 2
CROSS = 2
THREE = 2
NAILS = 1
THORN = 3
CROWN = 1

ADDING THESE TOGETHER WE GET 11
NOW WE CAN ADD 407 +137 + 11 = 555, Christ is mentioned 555 times in bible

I HAVE BUILT MAGIC SQUARES FOR ALL THE NAMES AND WORDS AND IT WORKS PERFECT AS A CUBE WHICH CAN UNFOLD TO A CROSS I THINK THE MATHS OF ALL OF THIS IS DESCRIBING A TORUS
FROM DEAN DAVID SCALES

[Richard Amiel McGough]

IF A = 1 AND B = 2 AND C = 3 ALL THE WAY TO Z=6

THEN

JESUS = 74

CROSS = 74

THREE = 56

NAILS = 55

THORN = 75

CROWN = 73

ADDING THESE VALUES WE GET 407 WHICH IS A NARCASISTIC NUMBER, 11 X 37 = 407

THREE NAILS = 3 X 37

JESUS CROSS = 4 X 37

CROSS THREE NAILS = 5 X 37

JESUS THORN CROWN = 6 X 37

JESUS CROSS THREE NAILS = 7 X 37

JESUS CROSS THORN CROWN = 8 X 37

JESUS THORN CROWN THREE NAILS = 9 X 37

ALL WORDS INVOVED ARE 5 LETTER WORDS AND ARE MULTIPLES OF 37 IN DIFFERENT ARRANGEMENTS, SO NOW I WANTED TO CONCENTRATE ON NARCASISTIC NUMBERS MORE, SOMEWHERE IN THE BIBLE 153 FISH CAUGHT,

SO THE NARCASISTIC NUMBERS ARE 153, 370, 371, 407

WE CAN SEE THAT 370 AND 407 ARE DIVISABLE BY 37

370 = 10 X 37 AND 407 = 11 X 37

BUT 153 AND 371 ARE NOT DIVISABLE BY 37

SO THEN I CHECKED THE DIVISORS OF ALL FOUR OF THE NARCASISTIC NUMBERS AND WE GET

153/1=153 370/1=370 371/1=371 407/1=407 ......IGNORE THIS LINE

153/3=51 370/2=185 371/7=53 407/11=37

153/9=17 370/5=74 371/53=7 407/37=11

153/17=9 370/10=37

153/153=1 370/370=1 371/371=1 407/407=1.....IGNORE THIS LINE


Hey there Dean,

Welcome to our forum,

:welcome:

I noticed that you posted the same thing in three threads. I deleted the other two because it doesn't make any sense to repeat the same in formation in three different places on this forum.

If you want folks to understand you, you should define your terms. Here is the definition of "narcissistic numbers" from Worlfram's mathworld (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/NarcissisticNumber.html):
An http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/NarcissisticNumber/Inline1.gif-digit (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Digit.html) number that is the sum (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Sum.html) of the http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/NarcissisticNumber/Inline2.gifth powers (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Power.html) of its digits (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Digit.html) is called an http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/NarcissisticNumber/Inline3.gif-narcissistic number. It is also sometimes known as an Armstrong number, perfect digital invariant (Madachy 1979), or plus perfect number. Hardy (1993) wrote, "There are just four numbers, after unity, which are the sums of the cubes of their digits: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/NarcissisticNumber/Inline4.gif, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/NarcissisticNumber/Inline5.gif, http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/NarcissisticNumber/Inline6.gif, and http://mathworld.wolfram.com/images/equations/NarcissisticNumber/Inline7.gif. These are odd facts, very suitable for puzzle columns and likely to amuse amateurs, but there is nothing in them which appeals to the mathematician." Narcissistic numbers therefore generalize these "unappealing" numbers to other powers (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Power.html) (Madachy 1979, p. 164).
I can't quite tell what you are trying to accomplish, since you didn't state the purpose of your post or the meaning of your results. I get the impression that you think English gematria somehow proves something about Jesus?

A few tips:

1) State what you are trying to prove.
2) Define your terms.
3) Learn to spell "narcissist."
4) Do NOT write in ALL CAPS since that makes your posts less readable and it makes it seem like you are SHOUTING.

Also, I note that you use the word "thorn" rather than "thorns" in your calculations because you like the way the numbers work. This is why results such as yours have no meaning. They are the result of cherry picking the words from a vast list of random possibilities. We see the same "manipulation game" when you ignore those two lines of sums. There have been a lot of folks enthused by English Gematria because it is so simple (don't need to learn Greek or Hebrew!). But I've never seen anything that suggests it is valid or that it proves anything relating to Christ or the Bible. Here is one of the explanations I gave some time ago in another thread:



The problem with English Gematria calculated from the place values is based on the fact that 83% of all the words are compressed into a numerical range between 50 and 150. I analyzed a dictionary with about 79,000 words, and found that about 66,000 of them had a value between 50 and 150. Here is a graph that shows the distribution:

http://www.biblewheel.com/images/EnglishGemGraph.gif

This means that all the information stored in the pattern of the letters is lost. Any structure that could have been there has been compressed to such an extent that all distinctions are lost and we have nothing but a meaningless smooshed mess o' porridge.

Note in particular that most of the numbers ccc used in his post - 73, 74, and 88 - are found near the peak of the distribution where there were over 700 choices to choose from. And that's not counting the foreign transliterated words like Y'shua (note that he could have chosen Yeshua if that had fit the pattern he was looking for).

Now don't mistake what I am trying to demonstrate here. Lists of words can be useful if the reality of divine design based on gematria has already been proven by other means. But such lists, especially when based on ordinal systems which have an extremely high compression ratio, lose too much information to be useful by themselves.

Richard



The real problem with this kind of "research" is that there is no way to tell chance from design, and it is based on arbitrarily choosing words that you "like" and even choosing forms of those words (e.g. thorn vs. thorns) to make your desired patterns "work."

Richard