duxrow
07-15-2012, 06:13 AM
:bcake:
1. Noah had three sons, but no daughters. Right?
2. Joseph had two sons, but no daughters. Right?
3. Isaac had two sons, but no daughters. Right?
4. Ruth (Naomi) started out with two sons, and wound up with one daughter.
Just in the natural, if we were conducting a poll, wouldn't you expect a day would come (like in roulette)
when a generation would come along when the Adam's family had nobody to carry on the Name?
Zelophehad had five daughters (one named 'Noah'), but no sons.
Numb26:32: And of Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites: and of Hepher, the family of the Hepherites.
v33: And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.
Not a chance, you say, that the story leads us to ANOTHER Joseph; and this one has a daughter, but no sons! :winking0071:
1. Noah had three sons, but no daughters. Right?
2. Joseph had two sons, but no daughters. Right?
3. Isaac had two sons, but no daughters. Right?
4. Ruth (Naomi) started out with two sons, and wound up with one daughter.
Just in the natural, if we were conducting a poll, wouldn't you expect a day would come (like in roulette)
when a generation would come along when the Adam's family had nobody to carry on the Name?
Zelophehad had five daughters (one named 'Noah'), but no sons.
Numb26:32: And of Shemida, the family of the Shemidaites: and of Hepher, the family of the Hepherites.
v33: And Zelophehad the son of Hepher had no sons, but daughters: and the names of the daughters of Zelophehad were Mahlah, and Noah, Hoglah, Milcah, and Tirzah.
Not a chance, you say, that the story leads us to ANOTHER Joseph; and this one has a daughter, but no sons! :winking0071: