Cherry Picking: A Fundamental Cognitive Error

How to interpret the Bible?
bluetriangle
Posts: 175
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2025 9:28 pm

Re: Cherry Picking: A Fundamental Cognitive Error

Post by bluetriangle »

RAMcGough wrote: Mon Mar 23, 2026 6:05 pm
Hey there Bill,

I really appreciate your answer, though I still have no idea what you really mean.

You said "Jesus returned as two men". That's nothing like saying those two men were symbolic representations of the death and resurrection of Christ. How could symbolic representations constitute the actual return of the PERSON of Jesus Christ? And besides, what does the death and resurrection of Christ have to do with His Second Coming? What do you think the phrase "Second Coming" even means?

I look forward to your answers.

Peace,

Richard
Well, first of all it’s not me saying this, it’s what the code is saying. I don’t fully understand it myself and this is my attempt at interpreting it, although I had plenty of help along the way.

There are several fundamental questions about the nature of reality, the soul, of Christ and the outworking of Biblical prophecy that are difficult to discuss with other Christians. For one thing, I don’t wish to upset anyone or get involved in protracted debates. I had my message to deliver and I delivered it.

Too many Christian beliefs are rigid and unyielding. For example, reincarnation is not taught and we are to accept that we have one life, before being judged for all eternity. That makes no sense to me and in fact seems cruel and more a reflection of the church fathers' mindset than of reality. Jesus’ return, as the code explains it, was a double reincarnation, one soul in two bodies. What does it even mean to say that God’s only Son has a soul? Isn’t he God? Can a soul split in two, or ten? Perhaps there is only one soul, the soul of God the Father, of which we all have tiny fragments.

Yes, what does the phrase ‘second coming’ really mean? It’s not actually in the Bible, although verses like 1 Thess. 5.23 clearly prophesy a return.

Could it be that the second coming was designed to fulfil Christian expectations? It certainly got the world’s attention, if not its understanding.

What the world needs to hear is that Jesus has returned and we are now at the beginning of the Golden Age.

As for literal versus symbolic, in 2002 I had a vision I told you about, where the superimposed faces of OBL and PJPII, both dressed in white, were shown, above the words THIS IS JESUS. Do I take that literally or symbolically?
Post Reply